based on one statement & two arguments Detailed Explanation And More Example

MOST IMPORTANT verbal reasoning - 2 EXERCISES

Top 10,000+ Verbal Memory Based Exercises

Directions:
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer
    (a) if only argument I is strong;
    (b) if only argument II is strong;
    (c) if either I or II is strong;
    (d) if neither I nor II is strong and
    (e) if both I and II are strong.

The following question based on statement & arguments topic of verbal reasoning

Questions :
  • Statement:
  • Should higher education be restricted to only those who can bear the expenditure?
  • Argument :
  • I. Yes. Higher education is very costly, hence it should not be given free.
  • II. No. There are a large number of brilliant students who cannot afford to pay and they should be given higher education.

(a) if only argument I is strong;

(b) if only argument II is strong;

(c) if either I or II is strong;

(d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

The correct answers to the above question in:

Answer: (b)

For the all-round progress of the nation, all the students, especially the talented and intelligent ones, must avail of higher education, even if the government has to pay for it.

So, only argument II holds.

Practice statement & arguments (based on one statement & two arguments) Online Quiz

Discuss Form

Valid first name is required.
Please enter a valid email address.
Your genuine comment will be useful for all users! Each and every comment will be uploaded to the question after approval.

Read more one statement two arguments questions Based Verbal Reasoning Questions and Answers

Question : 1

  • Statement:
  • Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in the future?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. There is no need to block a huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle.
  • II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of a sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

Oil, being an essential commodity, our country must keep it in reserve. So, argument I is vague.

while argument II holds as it provides a substantial reason for the same.

Question : 2

  • Statement :
  • Should India develop a national water grid by connecting all the rivers in the country?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. This is not just possible as we do not have the technical know-how.
  • II. Yes. This will greatly help the entire country by effectively channelising the excess water to the areas having a shortage.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

A single network of all the rivers in the country would surely enable a good distribution of water to all areas. So, argument II holds strong.

Also, a policy beneficial to the nation cannot be hindered owing to a lack of know-how. Ways can be devised to build up such a network. So, argument I is vague.

Question : 3

  • Statement :
  • Should Government close down loss-making public sector enterprises?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. All employees will lose their jobs, security, and earning, what would they do?
  • II. Yes. In a competitive world, the rule is 'survival of the fittest'.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (a)

Closing down public-sector enterprises will definitely throw the engaged persons out of employment. So, argument I holds. Also, closing down is no solution for a loss-making enterprise.

Rather, its causes of failure should be studied, analyzed and the essential reforms implemented. Even if this does not work out, the enterprise may be privatized. So, argument II is vague.

Question : 4

  • Statement:
  • Should India give away Kashmir to Pakistan?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. Kashmir is a beautiful state. It earns a lot of foreign exchange for India.
  • II. Yes. This would help settle conflicts.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (a)

Clearly, India cannot part with a state that is a major foreign exchange earner to it. So, argument I holds strong.

Further, giving away a piece of land unconditionally and unreasonably is no solution to settle disputes. So, argument II is vague.

Question : 5

  • Statement:
  • Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.
  • II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

Clearly, an increase in the number of High Courts will surely speed up the work and help to do away with the pending cases. So, argument II holds strong.

In light of this, the expenditure incurred would be ‘utilization', not 'wastage’ of money. So, argument I do not hold.

Question : 6

  • Statement:
  • Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get a salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
  • II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong.

Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic’. So, I is vague.

Recently Added Subject & Categories For All Competitive Exams

New 100+ Compound Interest MCQ with Answers PDF for IBPS

Compound Interest verbal ability questions and answers solutions with PDF for IBPS RRB PO. Aptitude Objective MCQ Practice Exercises all competitive exams

02-Jul-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

100+ Mixture and Alligation MCQ Questions PDF for IBPS

Most importantly Mixture and Alligation multiple choice questions and answers with PDF for IBPS RRB PO. Aptitude MCQ Practice Exercises all Bank Exams

02-Jul-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

IBPS Profit and Loss Questions Solved Problems with PDF

Most important Profit and Loss multiple choice questions and answers with PDF for IBPS RRB PO. 100+ Aptitude MCQ Practice Exercises all competitive exams

28-Jun-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

100+ Average Aptitude Questions Answers solutions MCQ PDF

New Average multiple choice questions and answers with PDF for IBPS RRB PO. 100+ Quantitative Aptitude MCQ Practice Exercises all competitive exams

28-Jun-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »