based on one statement & two arguments Practice Questions Answers Test with Solutions & More Shortcuts

Directions:
Directions: Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument. Give answer
    (a) if only argument I is strong;
    (b) if only argument II is strong;
    (c) if either I or II is strong;
    (d) if neither I nor II is strong and
    (e) if both I and II are strong.

Question : 11 [M.A.T. 2004]

  • Statement:
  • Should agriculture in rural India be mechanized?
  • Argument :
  • I. Yes. It would lead to higher production.
  • II. No. Many villagers would be left unemployed.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (a)

Clearly, mechanization would speed up the work and increase production. So, the argument I is strong enough.

Argument II is vague because mechanization will only eliminate wasteful employment, not create unemployment.

Question : 12 [Bank P.O. 2003]

  • Statement:
  • Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government?
  • Argument :
  • I. Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kickstart some 'self-employment' venture.
  • II. No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (e)

Young people, who do not get employment due to a large number of applicants in all fields, must surely be given an allowance so that they can support themselves.

So, argument I is valid. However, such allowances would mar the spirit to work, in them and make them idle. So, argument II also holds.

Question : 13 [R.B.I. 2003]

  • Statement:
  • Should all the practising doctors be brought under Government control so that they get a salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
  • II. Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

A doctor treating a patient individually can mislead the patient into wrong and unnecessary treatment for his personal gain. So, argument II holds strong.

Also, a policy beneficial to common people cannot be termed 'undemocratic’. So, I is vague.

Question : 14 [I.B.P.S. 2002]

  • Statement:
  • Should there be more than one High Courts in each state in India?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. This will be a sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.
  • II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (b)

Clearly, an increase in the number of High Courts will surely speed up the work and help to do away with the pending cases. So, argument II holds strong.

In light of this, the expenditure incurred would be ‘utilization', not 'wastage’ of money. So, argument I do not hold.

Question : 15 [M.A.T. 2005]

  • Statement:
  • Should India give away Kashmir to Pakistan?
  • Argument :
  • I. No. Kashmir is a beautiful state. It earns a lot of foreign exchange for India.
  • II. Yes. This would help settle conflicts.

a) if only argument I is strong;

b) if only argument II is strong;

c) if either I or II is strong;

d) if neither I nor II is strong and

e) if both I and II are strong.

Answer: (a)

Clearly, India cannot part with a state that is a major foreign exchange earner to it. So, argument I holds strong.

Further, giving away a piece of land unconditionally and unreasonably is no solution to settle disputes. So, argument II is vague.

IMPORTANT verbal reasoning EXERCISES

based on one statement & two arguments Shortcuts »

Click to Read...

based on one statement & two arguments Online Quiz

Click to Start..
79 statement & arguments based verbal reasoning one statement two arguments question answer pdf

Recently Added Subject & Categories For All Competitive Exams

Free Percentage Questions Answers for SSC STENO 2024 Exam

Important Top Percentage Aptitude-based multiple choice questions and answers practice quiz series, Online Mock Test PDF for SSC Steno Grade C & D 2024 Exam

25-Apr-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

Free Antonyms (English) MCQ Test for SSC STENO 2024 Exam

Top Antonyms General English Section-based multiple choice questions and answers, Free Full Test Series & Online Quiz PDF for SSC Steno Grade C & D 2024 Exam

24-Apr-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

Free Ratio & Proportion MCQ Test for SSC STENO 2024 Exam

Top Ratio and Proportion Aptitude-based multiple choice questions and answers practice test series, Online MCQ Quiz PDF for SSC Steno (Grade C & D) 2024 Exam

23-Apr-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »

Free Synonyms (English) MCQ Test for SSC STENO 2024 Exam

Top Synonyms General English Section-based multiple choice questions and answers, Free Full Test Series & Online Quiz PDF for SSC Steno Grade C & D 2024 Exam

22-Apr-2024 by Careericons

Continue Reading »